12-02-2007, 08:59 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
It seems I was mistaken
__________________
Eudaimonia
|
12-02-2007, 12:06 PM
|
|
1 of 8,111,103,258
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: 41.36N-81.32W
Posts: 21,519
|
|
__________________
PANTIES
the best thing next to cuchie
"If God didn't want you to play with it, He would have put it between your shoulder blades,..... not at the end of your arm"
Except for speculation, we ONLY have NOW and EACHOTHER!
real world of cyber people ~ Pixies ~ real people of the cyber world
|
12-02-2007, 12:13 PM
|
|
Goddess Of the night
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,327
|
|
OMG how ridiculous is this.. So if a woman has been raped. She has to just wait an see if she is pregnant instead of getting the morning after pill as it might upset her pharmacist.
__________________
I love the night
I love the element of danger and the ecstasy of flight,
I love the night
I love to dance with a stranger and to feel his delight,
And when the dancing is through, I kick off my shoes,
And I listen to the beating of his heart
|
12-03-2007, 11:12 AM
|
|
Pixie's Resident Reptile
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Central MD, USA
Posts: 21,172
|
|
Thank you, judge for your hate-filled ILLEGAL endorsement of religion in the name of the state.
And areguments to the contraty are pure shit.
__________________
On the kinkometer, my kink measures as a sine wave.
|
12-03-2007, 06:26 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gekkogecko
Thank you, judge for your hate-filled ILLEGAL endorsement of religion in the name of the state.
And areguments to the contraty are pure shit.
|
I am unsure where the hate you refer to might be, but that opinion, shit though you think it may be, is a legal ruling upholding an individual’s civil rights over those of the State.
Much can happen between now and October – if people behave sensibly. For example Illinois has settled a similar lawsuit with a compromise which enables the prescription to be filled without infringing on anyone’s first amendment rights.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|
12-04-2007, 04:26 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,686
|
|
When the rights of the pharmacist not to dispense something they are licensed to (moral qualms) are seen to be stronger than the rights of a woman to not be pregnant, someone needs the gift of Solomon. There are no winners.
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|
12-04-2007, 05:22 AM
|
|
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,566
|
|
I wonder how this would play out if there were pharmacists who refused to dispense "dick up" drugs?
|
12-04-2007, 09:29 AM
|
|
Mrs FussyPucker
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 3,635
|
|
Perhaps I'm missing the point, but surely, if a pharmacist refuses to dispense the morning after pill, the woman in question can go elsewhere to a pharmacist who will?
The woman still gets her pill and the pharmacist has a choice as to what he dispenses based on his personal beliefs.
__________________
"Time flies like an arrow -
Fruit flies like a banana"
M Y - N A U G H T Y - P I C T U R E S ! !
|
12-04-2007, 10:18 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Loulabelle,
No Mam, you are not missing the point. You are quite correct; the issue does not involve being able to get medication, that was never in question. The issue is if the State can compel these citizens to act in a way that violates their principles.
Further, the compromise Illinois secured squares the circle, even if only approximately.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|
12-04-2007, 04:23 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Australia
Posts: 17,686
|
|
lou,
It is the point where the pharmacist is the only supplier.
Principles vs harm.
__________________
Calm, quiet, smooth, devastating
|
12-04-2007, 04:58 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Those who follow the link in the first post will be able to read:
"U.S. District Judge Ronald Leighton in Tacoma issued a preliminary injunction saying that pharmacists can refuse to sell the morning-after pill if they refer the customer to another, nearby source."
The issue does not involve being able to get medication, that was never in question.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|
12-04-2007, 05:08 PM
|
|
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,566
|
|
define "nearby"
If I have no means of transportation and live 45 miles away from the next pharmacy does that mean I am SOL?
|
12-04-2007, 05:12 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
Lilith,
How did you get to the pharmacy?
__________________
Eudaimonia
|
12-04-2007, 05:29 PM
|
|
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,566
|
|
Walked. Obviously you've never lived in a very small town. You can walk into your town but 45 miles to the next pharmacy is a bit much.
|
12-04-2007, 05:45 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 541,353
|
|
As and when the criticism becomes serious, so will my response.
__________________
Eudaimonia
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 PM.
|