09-29-2004, 12:12 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, England.
Posts: 72
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GingerV
Chill. I was suggesting this is what you meant. I was pointing out it probably was what Cassie meant as well.
Ah....then you weren't suggesting that women's behaviour should change to accomidate men's "needs." Merely that it _would_ change. I misunderstood you, and I appologise.
Yeah, well...it's around. We girls sometimes circle the wagons when we're feeling attacked. Something in your first post made me feel like she, and those like her who may well have wanted the mail-boy fired, needed defending.
Glad we have that much in common. I'm sorry I didn't get that impression from your previous post.
G
|
No apologies need, G. I've been misunderstood and misinterpreted all my life, I don't expect the world - male or female - to suddenly change to fit little Jaybee's need for concision, precision and relevance and logic.
On that note, if I'm being utterly honest, this is not the first time I've been taken out of context for my views by and about women. There, I've confessed. But I'm intrigued...what was it about my first post that made you feel like the women who wanted that guy fired were in need of defence?
By the way, you were right to circle the wagons...I'm actually an Indian...
J
|