data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f885b/f885bc38d665bc4502e6db39e63c3d101e5916e1" alt="Old"
05-20-2003, 01:57 AM
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94024/94024a406964422082cb5646b520979b41a2472a" alt="dadaist's Avatar" |
Am I really here?
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: near Chicago
Posts: 3,025
|
|
Here's one I heard during a trip to Arkansas once. I'd have to confirm it, but it sounds reasonable.
If you look at the left (western) edge of the state, you'll notice there's a diagonal part, and then a jog where it goes more or less vertical.
While mapping out the state, the surveyors were OFF on the western boundary (I can't say I remember why, now), but rather than go back and correct it, they just paid off a few of the Native American tribes for the encroachment into "Indian Territory." Otherwise the western edge should have been one straight, continuous latitude line.
#1476
|