View Single Post
  #5  
Old 08-27-2007, 11:19 AM
scotzoidman's Avatar
scotzoidman scotzoidman is offline
Turn it up!
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Music City
Posts: 9,293
Send a message via AIM to scotzoidman Send a message via Yahoo to scotzoidman
Quote:
The Motion Picture Assn. of America's ratings board cited the film's graphic sexuality for its decision. A source said too many of the film's sex scenes violated the ratings board's unwritten rules (like the number of allowable pelvic thrusts, for example) to make an appeal possible.

Sources who have seen the film said it contains at least three scenes -- one a long montage -- featuring multiple acts of aggressive sexual activity in different positions. There's no full-frontal male nudity (the source of some NC-17 rulings when shown in sex scenes), but male-on-female oral sex, non-S&M restraints and several nontraditional sexual positions are depicted, conveying the aggression and emotional conflict between the main characters.

When asked if anyone was shown, say, upside down, one viewer said, "It depends on where you're standing. They're very flexible."


Some of the funniest reading I've done in a while. Who says Americans are immature about sex?
__________________
Plug me into somethin'

If the theory does not conform to the facts, then the facts must be discarded.

No good deed ever goes unpunished

Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level, & beat you with experience.
Reply With Quote