Pixies Place Forums

Pixies Place Forums (http://www.pixies-place.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Sex Talk (http://www.pixies-place.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Nylon fetish (http://www.pixies-place.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14020)

Rockfish56 05-23-2003 08:47 PM

Nylon fetish
 
Fairly new here and maybe this has been covered before but don't know.
I have a big nylon fetish mainly for stockings and garters, but also can go for thigh high stockings w/out garters. Unfortunately my wife rarely indulges me by wearing stockings so sometimes I will settle for nylon pantyhose. But the underlying factor in all is nylon, 100 % nylon, not the stratchy lycra crap. And the sheerer the better. This works for me every time and was wondering if anyone else, guy or gal, had a similar fetish. And no I don't wear them myself. It has to be a woman for me.
Rick

skipthisone 05-23-2003 09:16 PM

I just think they are in the way when you play...but that sound when a nylon clad woman's legs rub together....spooolishish

PantyFanatic 05-23-2003 09:23 PM

I'm with you Rockfish56
 
Quote:
Originally posted by skipthisone
...but that sound when a nylon clad woman's legs rub together....spooolishish
For some it's "spooolishish",..... for others it's the sound of angel's harps.:p

Rockfish56 05-23-2003 10:41 PM

In the way??
 
How can stockings be in the way, they just enhance the whole thing, feeling that wispy nylon from the toes up the legs to the thighs then reach that soft tender skin of the upper thigh, and having spread the thighs, the golden triangle of lust.
pantyhose, yes they get in the way, but they are the last choice of a true nylon fetishist

BlueSwede 05-24-2003 01:12 AM

I don't have a nylon fetish, but I do lament the passing of the type of nylons that were sold in the 50's and 60's before pantyhose were available. They weren't the stretchy mesh or netting type of stocking that is more prevalent today. They seemed to run if you looked at them sideways, unfortunately (anybody remember women carrying clear fingernail polish in their purses to stop a run in an emergency?), but they were so silky smooth, with all the threads kind of running in one direction (vertically). It'd turn me on big time to feel my legs (especially up my thighs) when I was wearing them. Plus, even the old, plain garter belts women had to use to keep the stockings up were sexier than today's pantyhose.

dicksbro 05-24-2003 04:12 AM

I agree with you, BlueSwede. Those old nylons and garter belts were really sexy. Oh for the old, traditional values. :)

BTW, welcome to Pixies Rockfish56.

Rockfish56 05-24-2003 08:22 AM

Thanks for the welcome DicksBro. And BlueSwede you are playing my kind of music.

Lilith 05-24-2003 08:41 AM

I dislike pantyhose and love stockings. I worked for years selling lingerie for a major dept. store and we had to wear hose to work. I ordered every pair from the catalog because I refused to wear pantyhose. Stockings are much more erotic/ sensual. I felt sexy every day when I slipped on a garter belt and stockings. It kind of gave me a sexual attitude. And economically they were much more practical because when you get a run in one the other one is still great. You can always use the ones with runs to tie someone to the bedposts;)

T-S 05-24-2003 08:49 AM

drooling at the thought :lust:

ericthered 05-24-2003 04:40 PM

Fetish? What do you mean by fetish? The other guys have fetishes - you know - the perverts,weirdos and so on. I have a perfectly normal love of long female legs in sheer nylon.

Not panty hose of course - they are the work of the devil. They start off looking good, and then when you get to the interesting bit it's 'Sorry, road closed'.

Garter belt and stockings display a lady like the picture frame displays the Mona Lisa.

Rockfish56 05-24-2003 05:28 PM

Fetish??
 
Well Ericthered, I guess it all depends on your/my interpretation of the word fetish. I don't mean it to imply anything wierd or perverted, just my love for ladies in nylon.
We can certainly agree on that and lets leave it there. Stockings and garters rule. Pantyhose suck!!!!!!

ericthered 05-25-2003 02:52 AM

Rockfish56 Rule 1 - OTHER people do perverted things; by definition anything I do is normal. I'm surprised that isn't obvious.......

Rockfish56 05-25-2003 12:42 PM

Ericthered
 
Gotcha. Loud and clear.

PantyFanatic 05-26-2003 09:10 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by BlueSwede
.....I do lament the passing of the type of nylons that were sold in the 50's and 60's before pantyhose were available. ......(anybody remember women carrying clear fingernail polish in their purses to stop a run in an emergency?), but they were so silky smooth, with all the threads kind of running in one direction (vertically). It'd turn me on big time to feel my legs (especially up my thighs) when I was wearing them. Plus, ….. garter belts women had to use to keep the stockings up were sexier than today's pantyhose.


oh yes. :) I remember before pantyhose.

Oh yes. ;) I lived to see a run being repaired as a teen.

OH yes. :D Sooooooo silky against your cheek.

OH YES! Maybe they were sexy just for our generation, but OH YES!:lust:

SuccubusKitty 12-07-2003 02:34 PM

Looking at those old stockings and garter belts is one of the reasons I like the old pin-up art. I think that a woman is ultimately more alluring in stockings than in pantyhose or bare legged. Much more sensual.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.