1021 - looks like Dadaist got the "1000" post :)

#1021

Edit early, edit often.

#1023

(2^10) -1

1025...

I concur Dadaist... I have edited the post prior to the 1000th post to be 999.

Okay I think it's time to go post/read elsewhere. ;)

Sometimes it's easiest to NOT forecast a number, but go and edit that number in, once everyone has hit their post button.

#1025

and I am done posting here for a while... time to find a brew in the fridge...

>>1027<<

Yep, I'm done on this thread for tonight. I did one last check of my edits.

#1027

1029 is the number of posts at the moment......it may change once I hit submit! :)

Jenna, you mentioned the million bottles of beer possibility....
Have you seen
http://99-bottles-of-beer.ls-la.net/a.html

Talk about programmers with too much time on their hands.

On another note. If I were email subscribed to this thread, my inbox would be full and my ISP would be screaming at me ;)

#1029

#1031 fastly

edited for number

#1,034

When you go to the thread index, it will show the Thread, Thread Starter, Forum, Replies, Views, Last Post.

The number in “replies” is the responses to the thread being there. (the thread being there had to be a post) so “I” think you will always add one (1) to the number in “replies” to derive the number for the post [made by the person listed under “last post”]. We can just as well go with the number shown in “replies”. It is academic only.

But ………. it WILL become an issue when we reach milestones like 25k, 50k,100k etc. “who made the n post?”

We have a LOT of time to come to a consensus, but we better get it on the agenda as this progresses.

(just a thought) ;)

1035!