Children , animals , bodily waste. oh , and other guys :D .
Beyond that , I'll try anything once , hehe

Incest
 

As I see it, there are two issues in incest: The genetic risk and the distinction between parent and lover.

Incest with a dependant child is wrong because you can't be both a parenta nd lover. Incest that produces a child with a blood relative is wrong because of the higher chance of birth defects.

However, when you eliminate these two categories, I don't see that there is anything inherently wrong with incest. The mere fact that two adults happen to already be related is nothing against a sexual relationship as far as I'm concerned.

I would be very surprised if it ever actually happened in my case--I know of no living blood relatives and I can't picture any of my relatives by marriage being interested.

Re: Incest
 

I agree. Adult/minor is wrong and should be avoided Period. No question about it.

However I do not have a problem with siblings/cousins as long as the parties involved were not forced or abused and the encounters were mutual.

However the genetic issue is a big one, and precautions should be taken by those wishing to walk that line.

OIf course you could go the simple route and just do oral with each other.

No kids, no poo, and no amanials. every thing else is ok by me, motice I did not say anything about incest or pee.

C

None of the obvious no-no's and no spanking or bondage stuff.

You'll never hear "make me your love slave" unless he's the one
saying it.

You said, "what wouldn't I do", not "What would he do" !!!!!!!

I think that I pretty much agree with Dicksbro! Irish
P.S.Great minds think alike!

No caa-caa, rug-rats, animals or anything that leaves bodily marks (internal or external) indicating damage.
Notice I said "bodily".
My mind is already broken (so my bride says), so no great care is needed in that area!