Pixies Place Forums

Pixies Place Forums (http://www.pixies-place.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Sex Talk (http://www.pixies-place.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   circumcised vs uncircumcised (http://www.pixies-place.com/forums/showthread.php?t=48)

Lilith 04-30-2003 06:06 PM

I'm not circumsized and I like it that way;)

Scarecrow 04-30-2003 06:19 PM

I like Lilith that way also

ericthered 05-01-2003 07:59 AM

There are three main bodies of opinion that support circumcision; the Muslim faith, the Jewish faith and the AMA. I know about the motives of the first two, but I am not going to speculate on the motives of the third. I might get sued. But how much is a circumcision these days? It must be pretty easy money.

For what my opinion is worth, I don’t have any time for the religious motives either. If the Good Lord creates male babies with foreskins, who are the sex-obsessed old men to insist that He made a mistake that must be corrected by cutting it off. If you have a son, at least let him make up his own mind when he is old enough.

Sweet Thing 05-01-2003 08:13 AM

I have never been with an uncut guy so I really have nothing to base an opinion on. I will say that, if we ever did have a son, hubby and I both decided that we would not circumcise him...way too many risks of infection and mistakes with an infant. When he was older, if he wanted to be cut, we would support him all the way.

IceLore 05-03-2003 04:14 PM

I've had both, and would prefer cut. Uncut guys have it a bit better due to the fact (I think) they are easier to jack off, and I really believe that having a foreskin keeps the lil fella a bit more sensitive. To counter the sensitivity thing, my cut man, now DON'T LAUGH, wears a little hood over his wanker. Like a mini excutioners hood. Kind of cute on a creepy way... Anway, I have had some skanky encounters with natural guys that have turned me off. If I unroll the foreskin and there is toe jam and belly button lint in there...ther is a major problem! :) But there is something about a cut guy that turns me on. I love guys with a pronounced head cause it makes shuch a lovely ridge...and the site of an erect, cut member, with satiny skin all nice and smooth.....oh, well, I guess I'mm getting carried away here. heehee Um, yeah, I'm gonna go now. Got some stuff to do... :::blush:::

Irish 05-03-2003 06:16 PM

I have posted on this subject before.When I was born,I couldn't
be circumcised,because of a clotting problem.When I was erect,
you almost couldn,t tell that I wasn't circumcised.My foreskin drew
back,so much,that it almost looked as if I was cut.In my 40s,I
developed a rash in the area under, the head of my penis.I showed it to my doctor.He knew what it was when I told him about it.He said that it is so common that it has a medical name.
I had to be circumcised.He said that it has nothing to do with
cleanliness,it is a common occurence.I am now circumcised.I notice
NO difference in the sensation,of if your circucised or not.I have
experienced every sexual act,both ways.My wife,has also,had me both ways and she says that she notices NO difference.Barring
medical problems,if I could do things over,I would get circumcised
at birth.Avoiding erections,in your 40s,when you are used to,at
least,one climax,daily,sucks big time! Irish

Kissy 05-03-2003 09:51 PM

As to the question, which would I rather be with, I just don't care. There is not a difference to me.

As to the whole issue of medical practices, it is now considered a cosmetic surgery and hmo's and most health insurances will NOT cover this elective surgery. We were just told it will cost $200 to have it done. It does take a little more time to keep it clean, but I'm sure by the time an uncircumcised man is old enough to do it himself, he just isn't going to notice or care. If it now is only a religious and personal choice, then I think it may become less and less common.

My two cents :o

Mercury_Maniac 05-04-2003 12:36 AM

i'm not circumsized and i don't see what the big deal is,

sorry but i don't feel that i have to cut part of my dick off to try to be more hygenic

if you wash it daily it should be fine

Valerieks626 05-04-2003 10:06 AM

I have had both...and really don't see a difference between the two. I really don't think hygiene is an issue though. Hygiene is a personal bathing issue not at all related to whether a man has the skin or not. My husband was circumcised but is very clear that if we have male children that they will not be. I have too say I agree. He has done a lot of of research and says that circumcision decreases sensitivity.

Irish 05-04-2003 02:14 PM

Valerieks626---I have had every sexual act,both circumcised
& un circumcised.With me I notice no difference in sensitivity
From what the Dr.told me,hygiene,unless you're gross,doesn't
have anything to do with medical problems,either. Irish
P.S.After going thru what I did,I would have it done early,but
that's me.

IggysGirl 05-04-2003 02:51 PM

I have had both and prefer uncut. Iggy is uncut and I have so much fun with that itty bitty extra piece of skin. It may seem childish but I get really excited just looking at a snuffalupagus penis, but to each their own.

huntersgirl 05-08-2003 08:56 AM

I can't answer the original question due to the fact that my only experience has been with circumcised men. I do have two sons though, neither of which was circumcised. All of this talk about hygiene has me wondering if the information that my childrens doctors have been giving me is correct. For the last ten years all they have said is wash like normal, no special care needed and do not and I repeat do not pull back the foreskin to clean, it is unecessary and will begin to retract on its own when the time is right. So I guess my question is what is different about the hygiene, I would presume that once the foreskin begins to retract, which I understand happens at different points in time for each individual, that you would just take care to cleanse around and under the foreskin. My older son's foreskin does not retract all the way yet, the doctor insists that this is quite normal and that it should do so on its own, if it doesn't by the time he reaches puberty then there is a steroid cream that can help in seperating the skin around the head of the penis...so my second question would be...Have any of the uncircumcised men out there encountered this problem? And if you have, how was it resolved? Sorry for getting off topic, but being a mom of two sons and not having an uncircumcised man in my life, the information that is given is solely from the medical professionals, not from people who are in the same natural state...Thanks in advance:D

Mercury_Maniac 05-08-2003 10:17 AM

i guess i really haven't paid any attention to my penis when i was younger, but i've never really had any troubles that you have stated
so i don't know what to say,
i guess you can trust what the doctors say and if not you can always take them in for a checkup


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.