of course it is; from a humanistic standpoint, sexuality is a mighty fascinating topic and can relate to other anthropological subject-matter in some way or another. i think you’ve made an interesting start and perhaps you can use some of your data from this survey to formulate a hypothesis.

(if you are interested in some ideas read on) i heard an idea the other day that equated car purchases with longevity in relationships. that is to say that peeps who trade in an old car for a new car ever year or three tend to flit from person to person, whereas peeps who use a car til it can't be driven another inch tend to stay in relationships forever. i'll bet there is definitely a real correlation there, and i'd also bet that there's a correlation between car type and color and sexuality, after all a car can be a major indicator of personality type and personality type can be a significant factor in sexuality and sexual preference.

good luck with your study

I've never had sex with any of my cars, and I've owned both males & females.

I thought cars were female?

How do you tell the sex of a car?

OMG, I can't wait to hear his answer to this one. :D

Me either!! :D

Ya gotta know where to look. ;)

Damn, that's one hell of a dipstick. :p

:roflmao:

*snort*

it's a bit easier to figure out on a motorcycle, though

OMG.......it looks like its pooping. LOL!!!!!!!!

Intoxication

Maaaaaaaaaaaaate!

Is this a proposed or current assignment?

What is the wording of the assignment question?

At your age you should be halfway into your second year, so this seems a little vague.

If you don't have a premise to test, eg, sublimation of sexual activity through big red car syndrome or the inverse correlation between vehicle modification and body piercing/modification, you are whistling in the dark.

I'm with Lou and wyndhy on this.

This is not the standard I expect from Flinders University.

Can't help but wonder what Mark Vieth's thinking.

Master's
 

I did scads (how's that for a Uni term?) of research on for my "contribution to scholarly research" to obtain my MSN. Not too surprisingly it dealt with matters of women's sexuality and health care, particularly women in "alternative sexual lives" (I have a LIFE, not a "lifestyle")

The thing is, not once did I ever consider bothering my friends here.

Don't know exactly why, just seemed to violate the "rules of friendship" we have here, and please please oh god PLEASE don't ask me to define or list those rules. You either know them already, or you don't.

WW, RN, BSN, MSN

((((((WW))))))

Your posts should be compulsory reading to all new Pixies.....they already are for all us old ones!

Rarely, if ever, did I read anything from an 800 or 900 level course in college even remotely as compelling as Wanda's posts. She puts it right out there for all of us to see and the info is always incredibly informative and thought provoking.

That's just one of the reasons why we love you dear.

(((WW))) :x: