Hiya Mark,

I think wyndhy was meaning that there's no 'shoulds' and 'should nots' when it comes to sex between consenting adults. If Aqua wanted to be spit roasted by two women (with aforementioned strap-ons...come on Aqua, you know you want to!) two men, or one of each, then that just as equally 'should' be as him being the 'giver'.

We're equal opportunities pervs round here and not ones to judge a guy for taking it up the...er...Arsenal....I think that's all she was trying to say, wasn't it wynd?

:hot::hot::hot:

:corn:

:roflmao:

Well, a lot of factors made it awful. One being that they were two of my best friends (we are still friends and thankfully its not been too awkward), two being that it was not a very comfortable position for me at all, the lights were so bright that I felt like I was in an exam room. lol

It just wasnt a pleasant experience, and I have no interest in doing it again...and, I might add too it wasnt really a fantasy of mine. It was a spur of the moment thing.

Yep...been there done that :sad:

Nah, Oldfart does not share well with the other children.

"spit roasted"
 

Funny thing, when I first started taking part in that most delicious act, we called it "tower bridge" after the famous bridge in London, two tall towers, conected by a span between them. (just use a little imagination) I even mentioned it by that name in my profile, and received a lot of questions about what it meant.
It has been called "bridging" "connecting", or "connector" "end to end" "the javelin" "the OVP" (oral vaginal penetration) of course the "OAP", the "long 3sum" and so on. I have done it too many times to count. I have done it with 2 men, a couple, and yes, with 2 women.
It is NOT something a woman should do unless she is in full control of her faculties, like being drunk. I have to work to give good oral sex, and to do it while being fucked reuires skill and attention, believe me!
And I don't want to be bent in ways my body doesn't move, so I need to keep aware of where I am and what I am doing.

I have only recently learned the term "spit roast". At first I was just amused, but now I have issues with it.
Frankly, at the risk of sounding like my "bitch feminist" other self, it's demeaning.
Not the act! I LOVE the act, it is a wonderful, intense, exciting experience, and I would not give it up!

It's the term. "Spit Roast" is too suggestive of the idea that I am just a piece of meat.

Anyway, yes, I have done it, I love it, and do it a LOT!

WW

Well WW I wonder if it was tried on a water bed, would it be called the floating bridge? :faint:

water beds...
 

...are overrated for orgies. Sweetie, I appreciate the joke, but waterbeds are better for less vigorous activities.

Besides, I think I would get malade de mer.

I mean think of it, taking a man deep in my throat, rocking back and forth and up and down, side to side, the wave movement... and oopppssss!

Yuckk!!

WW

I'll volunteer :kissass:

I have to go with WW on that ^^^, only in reverse.
My 'first' reaction was like her considered thought. I too know this by most of the other terms but have enjoyed it only few times.:(

After reading the responses of interest in the true pleasures of this act, I marked it off as 'another' UNconsidered repeating of a term from a source with a very different attitude.

I also concur with WW about the 'overrated water bed' for sex of any kind. I MUCH rather be on a BIG bed with lots and lots of pillows. :loveshowe :3way: :hump: :bj: :buttsex: :licker: :69: :cheerlead

/me agrees....waterbeds suck.

Water beds and sex.....hmm brings a whole new meaning to sea sickness! :roflmao:

Though I've never been there, I've often thought about doing that. I'd love it if Mrs. WI & I were 69'ing and another guy was fucking her. Now THAT sounds fun! :hot:

Hmmmm, which is the better trip for me........ California to see my mom or heading out to help WI with his situation? :p