PDA

View Full Version : Sex with a mannequin? S.D. Supreme Court says keep it behind closed doors


Aqua
11-13-2007, 08:44 PM
(SF)

Michael James Plenty Horse's indecent exposure conviction was overturned by the South Dakota Supreme Court.

By Mallory Simon
Court TV

If you have sex with a mannequin behind closed doors, you cannot be found guilty of indecent exposure, according to the South Dakota Supreme Court.

In a 5-0 ruling, the justices Thursday overturned the conviction of Michael James Plenty Horse for indecent exposure because he didn't attempt to arouse others when he tried to have sex with the mannequin in a dark, closed room at a YMCA in Sioux Falls, S.D.

On Nov. 14, 2005, Plenty Horse, then 19, went to the YMCA's Alumni Room, which housed memorabilia and photos of local high school students, including a mannequin wearing a band uniform, on the second floor of the building.

Once inside the empty room, he closed the door, turned off the lights, took the mannequin over to a desk and began trying to have sex with it, according to court documents.

A security guard opened the closed door, turned on the lights and saw Plenty Horse on top of the partially undressed mannequin, his pants down and a wadded piece of paper in his hand, court documents said.

WildIrish
11-14-2007, 10:54 AM
With a band uniform? :confused:

jseal
11-14-2007, 11:12 AM
... If you have sex with a mannequin behind closed doors, you cannot be found guilty of indecent exposure ...
Yeah, sure. Tell THAT to the poor guy who was caught in flagrante delicto with the bicycle!

Mannequins OK. Bicycles not OK? :huh:

Serious problems in the old judicial system, Imathinin!

gekkogecko
11-15-2007, 09:46 AM
CMIIW, but wasn't the bicycle thing in public?

WildIrish
11-15-2007, 09:50 AM
The bicycle dude was in a locked room.


Maybe he didn't have the light off. :D