PDA

View Full Version : The Internet was Made for Porn


Lilith
07-21-2007, 06:00 PM
not little old ladies. (http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/07/20/superfast.net.ap/index.html) Well at least not at that speed :D

jseal
07-21-2007, 06:08 PM
I'm jealous!

IowaMan
07-21-2007, 06:36 PM
That's exactly the kind of connection I don't need. I spend far too much time dicking around online as it is. I did sort of get a kick out of how they say she's not making the most of the connection because she just uses it to read newspapers.

gekkogecko
07-23-2007, 09:11 AM
No, the internet is for...

http://www.iowafarmertoday.com/corn_cam/

WildIrish
07-23-2007, 11:08 AM
they say she's not making the most of the connection because she just uses it to read newspapers.


That's what we all say. :roflmao:

Winston77
07-23-2007, 11:37 AM
as apposed to just looking at the pictures

LixyChick
07-23-2007, 05:22 PM
No, the internet is for...

http://www.iowafarmertoday.com/corn_cam/
Who the hell needs to watch corn grow? OMG...and I thought golf was boring to watch!

*ducks out before all the golf enthusiasts throw corn at me*

Oldfart
07-23-2007, 06:41 PM
From the same page as the original story, one with a little more fire.


LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- A judge has ordered a man to continue paying alimony to his ex-wife -- even though she's in a registered domestic partnership with another woman and even uses the other woman's last name.

California marriage laws say alimony ends when a former spouse remarries, and Ron Garber thought that meant he was off the hook when he learned his ex-wife had registered her new relationship under the state's domestic partnership law.

An Orange County judge didn't see it that way.

The judge ruled that a registered partnership is cohabitation, not marriage, and that Garber must keep writing the checks, $1,250 a month, to his ex-wife, Melinda Kirkwood. Garber plans to appeal.

The case highlights questions about the legal status of domestic partnerships, an issue the California Supreme Court is weighing as it considers whether same-sex marriage is legal. An appeals court upheld the state's ban on same-sex marriage last year, citing the state's domestic partners law and ruling that it was up to the Legislature to decide whether gays could wed.

Lawyers arguing in favor of same-sex marriage say they will cite the June ruling in the Orange County case as a reason to unite gay and heterosexual couples under one system: marriage.

In legal briefs due in August to the California Supreme Court, Therese Stewart, chief deputy city attorney for San Francisco, intends to argue that same sex couples should have access to marriage and that domestic partnership doesn't provide the same reverence and respect as marriage.

The alimony ruling shows "the irrationality of having a separate, unequal scheme" for same-sex partners, Stewart said.

Garber knew his former wife was living with another woman when he agreed to the alimony, but he said he didn't know the two women had registered with the state as domestic partners under a law that was intended to mirror marriage.

"This is not about gay or lesbian," Garber said. "This is about the law being fair."

Kirkwood's attorney, Edwin Fahlen, said the agreement was binding regardless of whether his client was registered as a domestic partner or even married. He said both sides agreed the pact could not be modified and Garber waived his right to investigate the nature of Kirkwood's relationship.

Garber's attorney, William M. Hulsy, disagreed.

"If he had signed that agreement under the same factual scenario except marriage, not domestic partnership, his agreement to pay spousal support would be null and void," Hulsy said. E-mail to a friend

Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

CunningLinguist
07-23-2007, 07:48 PM
No, the internet is for...

http://www.iowafarmertoday.com/corn_cam/

Oh man that is the hottest cornography I've ever seen!

Why isn't there a masturbation emoticon? Huh!

:nana:

IowaMan
07-24-2007, 04:22 PM
Who the hell needs to watch corn grow? OMG...and I thought golf was boring to watch!
So are you saying I shouldn't have pointed the camera out at the cornfield Lixy? If I had turned the thing the other way you'd see me naked and I highly doubt anybody would want to see that. :yikes:

Scarecrow
07-24-2007, 05:43 PM
Who the hell needs to watch corn grow? OMG...and I thought golf was boring to watch!


And what is wrong with watching corn grow?????? :huh:

sodaklostsoul
07-24-2007, 10:15 PM
And what is wrong with watching corn grow?????? :huh:
Ever see that movie "Children Of The Corn"?

Scarecrow
07-24-2007, 10:32 PM
No they have not passed through my fields yet